Islam holds a unique claim in comparative piety that its sacred scripture, the Quran, is not the fallible work of men paper their personal narrations of a long dead teacher tho the infallible dictated word of God. This essay will prey an overview of modern scholars thoughts on the origin, collection and development of the text. We shall begin with Noldekes account of the chronology of the text and move to look at Bells and Wansbroughs ideas before examining former(a) aspects of Quranic coherence.
Watts on Bells Translation
Watts writes that of Western attempts at forming a chronology of the Quran the most grievous book by far was Theodor Noldekes Geschichte des Qorans. Noldekes method was founded in traditional Muslim accounts of Quranic revelation and made use of aboriginal Muslim sources to construct a historical framework. From this starting prefigure he assumed progressive changes in style from proclaim poetical passages in the proterozoic years to long well-worn deliverances later. Noldeke can thus distinguish quartet separate compass points in Quranic revelation. The first Meccan period is distinguished by short suras and verses, and rhymic, ocular language. The second Meccan period illustrates the key theme of the text in nature and history. The use of ar-Rahman (The Merciful) is used in reference to God.
In the third Meccan period the characteristics of the second period intensify, ar-Rahman ceases to be used. For Noldeke the Medinan period was not so much a change in style, rather a change in theme, concentrating on laws and practices of the early Muslim community. In should be pointed out here that Noldekes pitch of suras is very similar to that used in the first Quran printed in Egypt by and for Muslims in 1925, differing only in the order of four suras. Watts believes Noldekes chronology places too...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment