The Debate of Proposition 8

Should sexual preference determine conjugal unions? This is the ongoing give our generation leave behind take a leak to ad get dressed. California has been in the epicenters of this debate as we witnessed voters oppose fairylike pairing in the elections of 2008. The success of suggest 8 discriminated a move onst those of homosexual orientation. mesmerism 8 ad moreovered Californias conjugation laws to prevent a change in quarrel, favoring the majority of heterosexual America. As Californias penning in article 1, section 7. reads, unless marriage surrounded by a man and a woman is comfortably-grounded or recognized in California (California Marriage Protection Act). This perceptual experience of marriage adopted to be law is built upon gender identity ideals that men and women have to fulfill. Women ar to marry that of the opposite gender and sex. Accordingly, the language use to describe marriage was contorted by gender ideals in the fight for Proposition 8. Those f or Proposition 8 argued it would restore the definition of marriage. From this perspective, marriage is seen as a tradition that is natural and immutable.To the contrary, the phone line against Proposition 8 states, OUR CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTIONthe law of our landSHOULD GUARANTEE THE SAME FREEDOMS AND RIGHTS TO EVERYONENO ONE group SHOULD be singled out to BE TREATED otherwise (Official California Legislative Information). Marriage is a right that cannot be exercised by all due to sexual preference. light and lesbians argon discriminated based on societies resistance to amend the definition of marriage past sexual preference. Additionally, the language utilise to describe marriage and the roles of individuals, is a major outlining factor piece of tail the issue itself.Analyzing the language used in both arguments allows us to moot further into this question and expose wherefore Proposition 8 should have been abolished. Proposition 8 is simply a resistance to change in language in how we come to define marriage. Typically, language changes as a result of kindly political and economic processes such(prenominal) as modus vivendi changes, new experiences, counters with technologies and communication media, colonization, or migration (Litosseliti 19). Although political action may punish to slow down this historical ongoing change in language, plainly as the world changes, so will the language.Marriage will finally cease to be defined by the standards of sexual preference. In such, the argument against Proposition 8 holds more validity than those in favor of it. Those unlike to Proposition 8 rely on Californias constitution promise for equal rights and freedom to every person, livelys included. This allowed those opposed to use goodish words associated with urbane rights such as, equality, dignity, freedom, and respect. These are portrayed to the audience from a fearless language lending more of feminine like characteristics of care, nurture, and ta ke.This alert language serves a purpose in relaying the message to oppose Proposition 8. As scholar Don Kulick believes, homosexual slang serves communicative functions, the nearly important of which is to reinforce group cohesiveness and reflect common interests, problems, and take of the population (Sonenschein 1969289) (Kulick 250). They used the gay slang as to draw care from all gay and lesbians to feel connected. They refer to themselves as the gay conjunction. This self maintained identity allows them to reach out to all gays and lesbians.For type, thither is a great example in YouTube, where the protest against Proposition 8 continues. In their advertisement they are promoting the Eve of Justice March for gay rights. In the video words displayed are if you believe followed by the jump words such as brio, happiness, kindness, beauty, compassion, and spot. These words of sentiment and support are a prime example of the gay language inducing activism throughout the gay lodge. In constructing particular subject positions for the readers or viewers, advertisements play a role in constituting identities (Litosseliti 108).The gay language so to speak allows them to require a desired identity for the gay community, which allows them to mobilize themselves within their civil rights movement. Additionally, the gay community has maintained a similar identity to heterosexual relationships on what role individuals play in a marriage. They believe in the similar manner as to what is expected out of a relationship. For instance in the official voters pathfinder an example of daily interaction mingled with spouses is descript as if to show they are not such(prenominal) different than a heterosexual marriage.The guide postulates, When youre married and your spouse is sick or brook, there is no confusion you get into the ambulance or hospital delegacy with no questions asked. IN EVERYDAY LIFE, AND ESPECIALLY IN EMERGENCY SITUATIONS, interior(prenominal) P ARTNERSHIPS ARE SIMPLY NOT ENOUGH (Official California Legislative Information). The gay community displays the similarity of marriage interaction in daily life is the resembling as any other marriage would be. Marriage roles are portrayed to be similar, and the situation presented above uses words such as, hurt and sick.This invokes the audience to relate to the situation presented of care and nurture for ones spouse. Although, there are some differences in the expected roles in a marriage, for only a single gender identity is shared between the spouses. For instance, in the role of a wedding usually both partners part the traditional clothing used for their sex. Lesbians dress in wedding dress attire as the gay men wear the traditional suit. This infers that in a gay marriage their roles are different than that of traditional couples.It objectifies the discover of two masculine or feminine figures in a relationship, demonstrating marriage is about love, and not fulfilling presc ribed gender roles. The symbolic meaning of payload is also displayed through the exchange of wedding bands. The gay communitys ideals on marriage are centered more around love than sexuality. Gays use this traditional wedding practice as a way to explicate the language of love, and equality in marriage. To the contrary, those in favor of Proposition 8 argue the need to restore the definition of marriage for the interest group of protecting the children.They argue that marriage itself is traditional and the meaning needs to be reallocated for sexual preference. The argument is made that domestic partnerships give all the same rights as a marriage just the title is different. Further, the language used to describe gay marriage is severely negative. Gay marriages are expound as same-sex marriages for the sole purpose of pointing out the sexuality of the marriage. We can signal this in the arguments presented that our children are to be protected from.The voters guide reads It prot ects our children from being taught in public schools that same-sex marriage is the same as traditional marriage (Official California Legislative Information). The argument uses strong words such as protect and traditional as if gay marriage were a threat to our ordering. Those in favor of Proposition 8 question why they should have to deal with gay marriages when elevation children. As I turn back there was an advertisement on television during election warning throng about societal issues our children will have to deal with. The commercial demo a hilds confusion as to why she had 2 daddies, besides mommies were the ones who made the babies. The childs confusion of marriage sexual identities promotes gay marriage as a accessible issue in raising kids. Those in favor of Proposition 8 claim that gays are putting their adult desires first before the children. Derogatory terms are used in protests against those who oppose Proposition 8. In rallies across California accompanime nt Proposition 8, such as the one on the left, implement the shade of hate. The term fag implies a negative connotation upon the being homosexual.Additionally, the word depraved implies that the gay lifestyle is a social burden to America. Those who support the banning of gay marriage perceive this as a social problem of a minority group attempt to change social culture. Gays should live private lives and not bring their lifestyle to the public celestial orbit and force society to change. Moreover, the argument against Proposition 8 holds a much stronger stand against those who support it. First, we must understand that language in society will always change and adapt to the needs of society.Marriage just as many other words will be redefined as society expands out of the two traditional gender roles. The gay community needs to be included as the law has to prescribe to everyone equally. As we see in the protest rallies, the movements association with civil rights of the blacks h elps their argument gain solidarity. A popular slogan across protests was Gay is the new unappeasable. I experienced protestors in Fresno, CA yelling this to supporters of Proposition 8. The correlativity of the blacks civil rights display their desires and emphasize discrimination.In addition, supporters claim children will be confused as to sexuality preferences, yet sexuality preferences dont usually profess themselves until puberty. In this adolescence the children will be able to kin(p) their own sexual preference. Those in support are simply trying to prevent gays from their prescribed rights. When have we ever heard of a phraseology word that needed its definition restored? Marriage is defined differently by many societies and who are we to say that a minority group should be exempt from it.As the gay language further manifests itself with civil rights language, it will draw increasing support from the gay community as well as civil rights activists. Works Cited Californi a Marriage Protection Act, 7. 5. Kulick, Don. Gay and Lesbian Language. Annual Review of Anthropology 29 (2000) 243-85. Litosseliti, Lia. Gender and Language possibleness and Practice. New York A Hodder Arnold Publication, 2006. Official California Legislative Information. 04 Nov. 2008. California Legislation. 05 Mar. 2009 .