'Alexei’s love for Polina Essay\r'

'Symposium is one and only(a) of those obsolete works, in which the debate on what esteem is becomes the commutation subject. Symposium is the written version of the discussion between the nous philosophers of Plato’s time, as for what hunch forward is. According to the Grecian mythology, and as Plato puts it, t present were supposed to be the both different types of Love †parking area Love and app tout ensembleing Love. What is the difference then? ‘What then is Love? ‘ I asked; ‘Is he mortal? ‘ ‘No’. ‘What then? ‘ […] ‘He is a great spirit (daimon) and like all spirits he is intermediate between the shaper and the mortal’.\r\n‘And what is his power? ‘ ‘He interprets between gods and men, transferral and taking across to the gods and prayers and sacrifices to men; […] for God mingles not with man; but through Love, all the sexual intercourse and converse of God with ma n, whether awake or asleep, is carried on’. (Plato, Symposium) Thus, this is the citation in relation to the so-called supernal lie with. This sack out, according to Plato is an honorable feeling and has honorable implications; this sleep with is absolutely derived of any sexual attitudes.\r\nHowever, the philosophers accept the topic that there is another kind of love †earthbound (common) love, which is the Love between a man and a woman, and thus includes the signs of sexual attraction, lust, etc. Pausanias in Symposium is the booster rocket of the idea that common love, despite its earthy character, is motionlessness to be set by virtues; other immaterial it is pitiful common love. On the other hand, it is also assertable to assume that the more virtue the Love has, the more heavenly it becomes. However, there is another interesting panorama which we meet reading Symposium: ‘…love, Socrates, is not, as you imagine, the love of well-favoured on ly.\r\n[…] love of generation and birth is in violator… to the mortal creature generation is a frame of eternity and immortality… and if as has been already admitted, love is of the perpetual possession of good, all men necessarily bank immortality together with good: Wherefore love is of immortality’. (Plato, Symposium) What is meant here is that sexual desire and physical love is dissolve of common love, when it is sincere, for the wish to leave the descendants and learn them continue your business and teach them life is what love is meant to do.\r\nThus, lust and sexual desire is not denied in this work; on the opposite, it is accepted as a part of common love, but when it is sincere and is driven by virtues; otherwise, love is deception and ugly. Plato appears to be wise enough to put the talk about Love in the form of debate, coming to the conclusion, that Love croupe be both common (earthly) and noble (of virtue). In addition, Plato writes that no matter whether Love is Noble or Common, it should be defined by virtues, as love without virtue, or based on deception, is ugly.\r\nPlato was one of the maiden authors to speak about the love between abundant and poor, thus including the social aspect into romantic feeling. Alexey’s feeling for Polina in â€Å"The Gambler” by Dostoevsky is quite an interesting and worth-analyzing. The girl has higher position in the society than his and he has no hope to follow her heart without money. He wins the game, got money and brought it to her. After Polina spends a night with him Alexei forgets about her. What does it mean? Does it mean that he had only a passion for Polina? No, if I was so, he would never have left her after one night.\r\nHere the passion to the game appeared to be stronger for the schoolgirlish man. So it was not only a passion, the common Love, that Plato calls it. So what was it? After Alexey’s leaving Polina it seems that he just wanted to win the heart of the enough girl for one night and this was not Love with virtue. However, when Polina found him, young man seemed to wake up, understand everything and wants to recover with love for her. Here we see that Alexey’s love for is really Noble Love replete of virtue as he believed that he would be able to change his life and his soul for give away being together with his beloved.\r\n'